Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences

Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences

Comparison between Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Networks for Porosity and Permeability Estimation

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors
1 Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Engineering Department, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Institute of Geophysics Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
      Porosity and permeability are two important characteristics of a hydrocarbon reservoir. The core measurements are usually used for these two parameters determination. This method is not only very expensive but also coring in many wells is not performable. Another method for this target is using of empirical equations. Any of these methods are associated with many problems. In addition, statistical methods will have some problems due to input data obtained from well logs.
Artificial neural network is a new method, recently used in oil industry for prediction of petrophysical properties.
This study is performed on Asmari Formation in Gachsaran oil field located in south of Iran. For porosity estimation two nets are used. One of these nets has 3 input parameters (density, sonic and neutron logs) and another has 10 input parameters (neutron, gamma, density, sonic, ILD, ILS, water saturation and spatial coordinate). Correlation coefficient between these nets predicted porosities and core porosities for generalization were 0.914 and 0.938 respectively and from multiple linear regression equation a 0.658 correlation coefficient is obtained. For permeability prediction two networks; one has six input parameters (density, sonic, gamma, ILD, ILS and porosity that obtained from porosity net with ten input parameters) and another with eleven input parameters (neutron, gamma, density, sonic, ILD, ILS, water saturation, spatial coordinate and porosity from porosity net with ten input parameters) and multiple linear regression equation are 0.851, 0.858 and 0.617 correlation coefficients are obtained respectively.
Keywords

Subjects


Balan,B., Mohaghegh,S., Ameri,S., 1995- “ State - of -Art in permeability determination from well log data : Part - 1 -A comparative study , Model development.’’SPE 30978 , PP:17-25.
Geological and Petrophysical Reports of Gachsaran Oil Field, 2003- Beicip Faralab Co,Archived of Moshaveran Energy Tehran Co.
Hearst,J.R., Nelson,P.H., Palliet,F.L., 2000-  ” Well Logging for Physical Properties,” John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Helle,H.B., Bhatt,A., Ursin,B., 2001- ” Porosity and Permeability Prediction from Wirelines Logs Using Artificial Neural Networks: A North Sea Case Study,” Geophysical Prospecting, 49, PP 433-444.
Lu,W., 2000- ”Neural Network Model for Distribution Bucking Behavior of Cold Formed Steel Compression Member”. Helsinki University of Technology of Steel Structures. Publication 16.
Mohaghegh,S., Ameri,S., Arefi,R., 1996- ”Virtual Measurment of Heterogeneous Formation Permeability Using Geophysical Well Log Responses,” Log Analyst, March-April.
Mohaghegh,S., Ameri,S., 1995- ” Artificial Neural Network as a Valuable Tool for Petroleum Engineers,” SPE 29220.
Mohaghegh,S., 2000- ” Virtual Intelligence and its Application in Petroleum Engineering, Part-1: Artificial Neural Networks,” JPT-September.