R. Deevsalar; M. V. Valizadeh; V. Ahadnejad
Abstract
Granitic rocks of Malayer plutonic complex contain varieties of enclaves with different shapes, sizes, mineralogy andchemical composition. The interpretation of bivariant geochemical diagrams of major oxides and trace elements with respect to higher values of some of oxides such as MnO, TiO2, MgO, ...
Read More
Granitic rocks of Malayer plutonic complex contain varieties of enclaves with different shapes, sizes, mineralogy andchemical composition. The interpretation of bivariant geochemical diagrams of major oxides and trace elements with respect to higher values of some of oxides such as MnO, TiO2, MgO, CaO& FeOt than host rocks in one groups of enclaves and moreover linear trend of these oxides and some of trace elements such as Ni, Cr, V indicate to different nature and mafic source of these enclaves (Mafic type) than host rocks and other enclaves (Felsic type).The study of chemical composition of this enclaves by using of univariant and bivariant statistical methods (bivariant regression analysis, correlation coefficients, cluster analysis and principle component analysis) indicate clear chemical contrast between mafic enclaves with felsic enclaves and granitic host rocks and in other side chemical affinity of felsic enclaves and their host rocks. Distinctive distribution of the majority of oxides and trace elements of mafic enclaves and host rocks and low values for R2 in regression analysis, low value of correlation coefficient of major element oxides and trace elements between enclaves and their host rocks, separate position of samples in cluster pattern and special direction of variants and samples of vectors in bivariant diagram of principle component analysis (PCA) are outputs of different geochemical characteristics of enclaves and host rocks. Moreover this correlates with different trends of each major oxides and trace elements in bivariant geochemical diagram (Harker diagram).
R. Deevsalar; M.V. Valizadeh
Abstract
The results of field studies (i.e. shape, dimensions, spatial distribution, condition of enclaves and xenoliths in the host rocks at available outcrops) experimental observations (i.e. petrographical and microstructural study of enclaves and xenoliths and whole rock geochemistry of magmatic encalves) ...
Read More
The results of field studies (i.e. shape, dimensions, spatial distribution, condition of enclaves and xenoliths in the host rocks at available outcrops) experimental observations (i.e. petrographical and microstructural study of enclaves and xenoliths and whole rock geochemistry of magmatic encalves) show that magmatic enclaves are mafic and felsic types, while xenoliths are hornfelsic. Elongation of magmatic enclaves and hornfelsic xenoliths along their apparent longitude axis in the margin of intrusive body are attributed to influence of stress on enclaves in melt or semi-solid phases and xenoliths in plastic form. In addition, this is related to impact of high force of magmatic flow in contact with metamorphic wall rocks. This indicates that the origin of xenoliths is the metamorphic rocks which lie at the periphery of the intrusive body. Existing of aligned mafic enclaves in the host, in addition to, presence of signs of plastic deformations (in microscopic scale) in micro-scale fluid features can be attributed to superimposition of solid-state deformation on magmatic flow. Due to lack of solid-state plastic deformation evidences, applicability of magmatic flow criteria and distinguishable interface of magmatic enclaves with host rocks in microscopic and macroscopic scales, spherical, globular, ellipsoidal and spindle shapes of mafic magmatic enclaves attributed to presence of theirs as mafic globule and packets in the host felsic magma, and also their similarity in superficial appearance, textural, mineralogy and geochemistry with the host rock, attributed to their different origin and magma mixing event. The formation of irregular shaped magmatic felsic enclaves with recognizable mineralogical and geochemical similarity to the host rocks, which are observed at the periphery or ceiling of the plutons, related to peripheral interruption in the primary phase of magmatic injection caused by the high pressure of consecutive injection pulse and replacement of new magmatic charge.
M. Sadeghian; M. V. Valizadeh
Abstract
Zahedan granitoidic pluton with general NW-SE elongation is located in the middle part of the Zahedan-Saravan granitoidic belt. It includes granites, granodiorites and diorites and it is also cut by numerous of andesitic to dacitic dikes. The regional metamorphic ...
Read More
Zahedan granitoidic pluton with general NW-SE elongation is located in the middle part of the Zahedan-Saravan granitoidic belt. It includes granites, granodiorites and diorites and it is also cut by numerous of andesitic to dacitic dikes. The regional metamorphic rocks of the area, with the age of Eocene, have been intruded by this pluton. In this research, emplacement mechanism of the northern part of Zahedan pluton has been studied with the aid of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) method. The results show that granitic rocks of the Zahedan pluton belong to paramagenitic granites (µSI) while diorites and granodiorites belong to ferromagentic granites (µSI). The magnetic lineations and foliations of the pluton mainly have low dip or sub-horizontal. In contrast, dioritic rocks which cover a small area, have magnetic lineations and foliations with high dip (sub-vertical). Therefore, dioritic rocks are considered as the feeder zone or the ascent location of the magma for this part of the Zahedan granitoidic pluton. Very low dip magnetic lineations and foliations suggest that Zahedan granitoidic pluton has been emplaced as sill. The activity of a very low dip simple shear movement has an important role in preparing a suitable space for emplacement of this granitoidic pluton.