Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Dept. of Earth Sciences, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, German .

3 Dept. of Earth Sciences, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, German

Abstract

Investigations made in current study illustrate that an application of 2-D isotropic inversion algorithm for magnetotelluric data affected by anisotropy could recover macro-anisotropy reasonably well. First anisotropy effects on common MT interpretation steps, dimensionality analysis and 2-D inversion modeling, are investigated. Two kinds of azimuthally anisotropic features (anisotropic block and anisotropic layer) which generally form a part of 2-D models are considered. The influence of different anisotropy strikes and resistivity contrasts on dimensionality analysis and on the behavior of induction arrows is studied. These investigations evince that, a strike direction close to the anisotropy strike can be chosen by the dimensionality analysis of the data. Then if the data are rotated to this angle, 2-D inversion would recover the anisotropy sensibly by means of macro-anisotropy. This procedure is tested successfully on a field data set where anisotropy had been previously recognized. The results show that the proposed approach reproduces the anisotropy acceptably via macro-anisotropy in the final inversion model.

Keywords

References
Bahr, K., Bantin, M., Jantos, Chr., Schneider, E. & Storz, W., 2000- Electrical anisotropy from electromagnetic array data: implications for the conduction mechanism and for distortion at long periods, Phys. Earth Planet. In. 119: 237–257.
Berdichevsky, M. & Dmitriev, V. I. 2008- Models and Methods of Magnetotellurics, Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Brasse, H., Kapinos, G., Li, Y., Mütschard, L., Soyer, W. & Eydam, D., 2009- Structural electrical anisotropy in the crust at the South-Central Chilean continental margin as inferred from geomagnetic transfer functions, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 173: 7-16.
Caldwell, T. G., Bibby, H. M., Brown, C., 2004 - The magnetotelluric phase tensor, Geophys. J. Int. 158: 457–469.
Eaton,D. & Jones, A., 2006- Tectonic fabric of the subcontinental lithosphere: Evidence from seismic, magnetotelluric and mechanical anisotropy, Phys. Earth Planet. In. 158: 85-91.
Egbert, G. D., 1997- Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing, Geophys. J. Int., 130: 475– 496.
Kellett, R. L., Mareschal, M. & Kurtz, R. D., 1992- A model of lower crustal electrical anisotropy for the Pontiac sub-province of the Canadian shield. Geophys. J. Int. 111: 141–150.
Kurtz, R. D., Craven, J. A., Niblett, E. R. & Stevens, R. A., 1993- The conductivity of the crust and mantle beneath the Kapuskasing Uplift:electrical anisotropy in the upper mantle. Geophys. J. Int. 113: 483–498.
Loَpez-Escobar, L., Cembrano, J. & Moreno, H., 1995- Geochemistry and tectonics of the Chilean Southern Andes basaltic Quaternary volcanism (37◦–46◦S). Rev. geol.Chile 22: 219–234.
Montahaei, M., Brasse, H. & Oskooi, B., 2010- (in press)Crustal conductivity structure of a continental margin, from magnetotelluric investigations. J. Earth & Space Physics vol. 36.
Pek, J. & Verner, T., 1997- Finite difference modelling of magnetotelluric fields in 2D anisotropic media. Geophys. J. Int., 128: 505–521.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A. & Vetterling, W. T., 1986- Numerical Recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge university press, Cambridge.
Rodi, W. & Mackie., R. L. 2001- Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversions, Geophysics, 66: 174– 187.
Simpson, F. & Bahr, K., 2005- Practical Magnetotellurics, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Twiss, R. J., Moores, E. M., 1992- Structural Geology. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 532 pp.
Wannamaker, P. E., 2005- Anisotropy versus heterogeneity in continental solid earth electromagnetic studies: fundamental response characteristics and implications for physicochemical state. Surv. Geophys. 26: 733–765.