Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Geology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the rotary drilling rate of the rock can save time and cost on exploration operations of the geotechnical projects such as dams, tunnels, oil and gas wells and building stone mines. In this study, the rotary drilling rate in limestone is estimated based on brittleness indices. To achieve this goal, the values of rotary drilling rate, Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) were determined in three exploratory wells drilled in limestone. Based on the data, the regression relationships of one, two and three variables between rotary drilling rate as a dependent parameter and brittleness indices as an independent parameter were developed. The results suggest that based on one- and two-variable regression relationships, rotary drilling rate can be estimated based on brittleness indices with relatively good accuracy. In addition, the results showed that the three-variable regression relationship was more accurate than the one- and two-variable in estimating the rotary drilling rate. Finally, the three-variable relationship presented in this study could be appropriate in the early stages of exploration operations for geotechnical projects in limestone, which saves time and money.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Altindag, R. and Guney, A., 2010- Predicting the relationships between brittleness and mechanical properties (UCS, TS and SH) of rocks. Scientific Research and Essays 5(16), 2107–2118. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000753.
Howarth, D.F., Adamson, W. R. and Brendt, J.R., 1986- Correlation of model tunnel boring and drilling machine performances with rock properties. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts 23, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(86)90344-X.
Howarth, D.F. and Rowland, J.C., 1987- Quantitative assessment of rock texture and correlation with drill ability and strength properties. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 20, 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019511.
ISRM, 1981- Rock characterization testing and monitoring. ISRM suggested methods. In: Brown ET (ed).
ISRM, 2007- The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds.), Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods.
Paone, J., Madson, D. and Bruce, W.E., 1969- Drillability studies - laboratory percussive drilling. Report of investigations (United States. Bureau of Mines), 7300.
Pathinkar, A. G. and Misra, G. B., 1980- Drillability of rocks in percussive drilling from energy per unit volume as determined with a microbit. Mining Engineering 32, 1407–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019511.
Rabia, H. and Brook, N., 1980- An empirical equation for drill performance prediction. The State of The Art in Rock Mechanics. Proceeding of the 21st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, University of of Missouri-Rolla. pp. 103-111.
Schmidt, R.L., 1972- Drillability studies - percussive drilling in the field. University of Michigan Library.
Selim, A. A. and Bruce, W.E., 1970- Prediction of penetration rate for percussive drilling. US Bureau of Mines RI 7396.
Selmer-Olsen, R. and Blindheim, O.T., 1970- On the drillability of rock by percussive drilling. Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of the Int. Society for Rock Mechanics, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. 
Thuro, K. and Spaun, G., 1996- Introducing the ‘destruction work’ as a new rock property of toughness referring to drill ability in conventional drill and blast tunnelling. Proceedings of Eurock’96: Prediction and Performance in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 2. pp. 707–713.