Volume 34 (2024)
Volume 33 (2023)
Volume 32 (2022)
Volume 31 (2021)
Volume 30 (2020)
Volume 29 (2020)
Volume 28 (2019)
Volume 27 (2018)
Volume 26 (2017)
Volume 25 (2016)
Volume 24 (2015)
Volume 23 (2014)
Volume 22 (2013)
Volume 21 (2012)
Volume 20 (2011)
Volume 19 (2010)
Volume 18 (2009)
Volume 17 (2008)
Volume 16 (2007)
Stratigraphy and Palaeontology
Biostratigrapy and Paleobathymtry of Gurpi Formation southwest of Kuhdasht

Ghamarnaz Darabi; iraj Maghfouri Moghaddam; Abbas Sadeghi; Bizhan Yusefi

Volume 29, Issue 114 , December 2019, , Pages 129-142

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2019.95053.1222

Abstract
  In this study, biostratigraphy and Paleobathymetry of the Gurpi Formation in section southwest of Kuhdasht were studied. The thickness of Gurpi Formation in this section is 160 meters and its main lithology includes Marl, Limy Marl, Limestone and Shale. In this section Lower boundary of Gurpi Formation ...  Read More

Evaluation of Late Campanian‒Early Maastrichtian surface water nutrients of the Gurpi Formation, Gurpi anticline: evidence from calcareous nannofossils

A Mahanipour; A Najafpour; M Dastanpour

Volume 26, Issue 102 , March 2017, , Pages 257-266

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2017.44069

Abstract
  Calcareous nannofossils have been investigated at the lower part of the Gurpi Formation at the southwest of Gurpi anticline. According to the index calcareous nannofossils CC22/UC15eTP to CC24/UC18 bio-zones have been identified and the age of Late Campanian ‒ Early Maastrichtian is considered for ...  Read More

Biostratigraphy of Gurpi Formation Based on Calcareous Nannoplanktons in Gach and Kurdeh Anticline Sections (Lar Region)

N Badri; A.L Kani

Volume 24, Issue 94 , March 2015, , Pages 19-26

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2015.42562

Abstract
  The Gurpi Formation has a wide extent in the Zagros Sedimentary Basin.It has received considerable attention due to its unique stratigraphic position, chronostratigraphic importance, and floral and faunal diversity and abundance.In order to biostratigraphically classification and correlation of theGurpi ...  Read More

Biozonation and Paleobathymetry of the Campanian -Maastrichtian Deposits Based on Planktonic Foraminifera in Jupar Section, Central Iran

B Ghasemshirazi; M.R Majidifard; A Kheradmand; T Mohtat

Volume 24, Issue 94 , March 2015, , Pages 65-72

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2015.42576

Abstract
  In this research, the Campanian -Maastrichtian deposits in Jupar section, Central Iran have been studied to determine biozonation and Paleobathymetry of the deposits. The planktonic and benthic foraminifera were studied in order to assign palaeobathymetry of the Campanian- Maastrichtian deposits. A depth ...  Read More

Lithostratigraphy, Microbiostratigraphy and Microfacies of the Ilam Formation in Southwestern Khorram Abad

S.H. Vaziri; D. Jahani; M. Safdari; F. Chegeni

Volume 17, Issue 67 , February 2008, , Pages 124-139

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2009.57824

Abstract
         The Ilam Formation in southwestern Khorram Abad with a thickness of up to 204 meters consists of uniform limestones with Middle Turonian to Early Campanian age which were deposited in a continuous sedimentation process. In this section, the Ilam Formation has continuous ...  Read More

Correlation between Campanian – Maastrichtian Deposit in Kopeh-Dagh and Central Iran Basins

L. Bakhshandeh; A. Aghanabati; T. Mohtat

Volume 17, Issue 65 , March 2007, , Pages 26-35

https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2008.58166

Abstract
  The first studied Abtalkh Formation with Campanian – Maastrichtian age is well exposed in Kopeh Dagh area (Mozduran section). This formation conformably underlain carbonates of Abderaz Formation and overlain by Neyzar sandeston Formation, both formations have a gradual contact. The second studied ...  Read More